Venue: Lavery Room - City Hall
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies Minutes: No apologies for inability to attend were reported.
|
|
Minutes Minutes: |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No declarations of interest were reported.
|
|
Motions Minutes: The City Solicitor informed the Committee that six motions had been received in advance of the Council on 3rd April.
The Committee considered each motion in turn and agreed the following:
|
|
50th Anniversary of Greenfinches in Northern Ireland PDF 409 KB Minutes:
Moved by Councillor Duffy, Seconded by Councillor Ferguson;
“That the motion be rejected.”
Amendment
Moved by Councillor T. Kelly, Seconded by Alderman Haire,
“That the Motion be referred to Council for debate, with no restrictions on the number of speakers.”
On a vote, nine Members voted for the amendment and nine against and, there being an equality of votes, the Chairperson cast the deciding vote in favour of the amendment.
The amendment was then put to the Committee as the substantive motion and accordingly agreed.
|
|
Police Service of Northern Ireland PDF 409 KB Minutes: That the Motion be referred to the Council for debate, with no restrictions on the number of speakers.
|
|
Graffiti - Development of Memorandums of Understanding PDF 410 KB Minutes: That the motion be referred, in the first instance, to the People and Communities Committee. |
|
Minutes: Proposal
Moved by Councillor Kyle, Seconded by Councillor Hanvey;
“That the Standing Orders be set aside, and the Motion be referred to the Council for debate.”
On a vote, sixteen Members voted for the proposal and none against and it was declared carried.
|
|
Minutes: That the Motion be referred, in the first instance, to the Strategic Policy and Resources Committee. |
|
Rosetta Way "Quietway" PDF 425 KB Minutes:
Moved by Councillor de Faoite, Seconded by Councillor Flynn;
“That the Motion be referred to Council for debate, with no restrictions on the number of speakers.”
Amendment
Moved by Councillor McCabe, Seconded by Councillor R-M Donnelly,
“That the Motion be adopted.”
On a vote, six Members voted for the amendment and eleven against and it was declared lost.
Accordingly, the proposal standing in the name of Councillor de Faoite was put to the Committee as the substantive motion and agreed.
|