Agenda item

To consider further the minute of the meeting of 12th December under the heading “Royal Maternity Hospital Liaison Group” which, at the request of Councillor Rodgers, was taken back at the meeting of the Council on 5th January (extract of minutes herewith)

Minutes:

            The Committee considered further the minute of the meeting of 12th December under the heading “Royal Maternity Hospital Liaison Group”.  A copy of the minute in this regard is set out hereunder:

 

“Royal Maternity Hospital Liaison Group

 

      The Committee considered the undernoted report:

 

‘Purpose of the Report

 

      To provide supplemental advice to the Committee in relation to how the Council might undertake a campaign in support of the provision of a new regional hospital for children and women on the site of the Royal Group of Hospitals.

 

Relevant Background Information

 

      The Committee, at its meeting of 21 November, considered a report submitted by the Director of Legal Services in relation to the question of support for the proposed new regional hospital for children and women.  Following a suggestion by a Member that the Council should incur expenditure of an appropriate amount in relation to mounting its own campaign in support of the proposed hospital, and following the contribution of a number of other Members to the discussion, the Director of Legal Services pointed out that any proposal of such a nature could lawfully be implemented by the Council pursuant to the special expenditure powers set out in Section 115 of the Local Government Act (NI) 1972.  However, he also pointed out that this would be in the context of cross party support for the proposal and he noted that the advice from Counsel had referred to the restriction in the 1972 Act which precludes the use of Section 115 for “party political publicity campaigns”.

 

Key Issues

 

      It would appear from the general thrust of the discussion at the meeting of the Committee on 21 November, and from a number of subsequent discussions with various individual Members, that a certain amount of support exists across the parties for the proposal to mount some form of campaign in support of the proposed hospital.  However, that support does appear to be qualified to the extent that any expenditure to be incurred should be of a reasonably modest nature and on the basis that any resolution by the Council in support of the proposal should attract support on a cross party basis.

 

      If Members are minded to support a cross party resolution that the Council should incur expenditure of a reasonably modest nature in pursuance of a campaign to support the provision of a new regional hospital for women and children on the site of the Royal Group of Hospitals, then such a proposal is legally tenable subject to the following

 

1.   the resolution attracts cross party support

 

2.   the Council agrees the level of expenditure to be incurred, which it is suggested might be in the region of £15-20,000

 

3.   the resolution to incur that expenditure be on the basis that, in accordance with the provisions of Section 115 of the Local Government Act (NI) 1972, the Council considers that the expenditure shall be in the interests of, and will bring direct benefit to the Council, its district, and the inhabitants of its district – and that the expenditure to be incurred is considered to be commensurate with the direct benefit to be so achieved.

 

      If the Committee is desirous of proceeding on this basis, and passes a resolution in the appropriate wording, then it is suggested that, for the purpose of taking the matter forward, a Working Group be established comprising of nominated Members from each of the Party Groups for the purpose of agreeing how the approved expenditure should be applied in relation to the proposed campaign of support.

 

      The Committee should also decide if it would be appropriate that the Working Group, if established, should also liaise, for information purposes, with the Royal Maternity Hospital Liaison Group, which the Committee will recall it received a presentation from at its meeting of 22 August 2008.

 

Recommendations

 

      It is a matter for the Committee, having considered the foregoing advice, to decide whether it wishes the Council to now undertake its own campaign in support of the proposed hospital, subject to the conditions which have been suggested by the Director of Legal Services.’

 

      Following a lengthy discussion, the Committee agreed that:

 

(a)  expenditure, up to a maximum of £20,000, in respect of the above?mentioned campaign be approved under Section 115 of the Local Government Act (Northern Ireland) 1972, it being the opinion of the Committee that the expenditure would be in the interest of, and would bring direct benefit to, the District and the inhabitants of the District, with the Committee being satisfied that the direct benefit so accruing would be commensurate with the payment to be made;

 

(b)  a fixed-term Working Group, comprising one Member from each of the Political Parties represented on the Council, be appointed to consider the most appropriate means of taking forward the campaign; and

 

(c)  a report on the recommendations of the Working Group in this regard be submitted in due course for the consideration of the Committee.”

 

            The Committee was advised that Councillor Rodgers, at whose request the minute had been taken back for further consideration, was unable to be in attendance at the meeting.  The Head of Committee and Members’ Services reminded the Members that Councillor Rodgers had indicated at the meeting of the Council that he wished the minute to be taken back to the Committee to enable it to give consideration to the submission of a request to the Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety to meet with an All-Party Deputation from the Council to discuss the issue prior to any expenditure on the project being committed.

 

            A Member pointed out that if the Committee were minded to affirm its decision then the Working Group could be established with the seeking of a meeting with the Minister to be the first item of business to be attended to.

 

            The Committee agreed to affirm its decision of 12th December and agreed also that when the Working Group had been established the first item of business to be dealt with would be to seek a meeting with the Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety.

 

Supporting documents: